“Illustration of normal septum pellucidum (thin membrane separating the lateral ventricles) in a non-antisocial control (a) and the cavum septum pellucidum in an individual with antisocial personality disorder (b).
Coronal magnetic resonance image slices are at the level of the head of the anterior limb of the internal capsule, caudate, putamen, accumbens, and insula. Highlighted within the bue box is the septum pellucidum, dividing the lateral ventricles and bordered superiorly by the body of the corpus callosum and inferiorly by the fornix. The normal control (a) shows a fused septum pellucidum, whereas the participant with antisocial personality disorder (b) shows a fluid-filled cavum inside the two leaflets of the septum pellucidum.”
Archive for psychopath
. . . yet sometimes I wonder whether these malignant brutes may not be the mutation that survives on this planet in this age. This age of technology and murder-for-empire. Maybe the softies will have to go, and the snake-hearted will inherit the Earth. Now, I’m betting on the democracies. But we’re living in an age of murder. In all history, there have never been so many people murdered as in our century. Add up all the murders from the beginning of history to 1900, and then add the murders after 1900, and our century wins. All alone . . . http://www.theatreink.net/shows/2013/bad%20seed/bspacket.pdf
Sadly this was written in the 1950s. I’m sure the authors, William March (the novel) and Maxwell Anderson (the play), thought knowledge of psychopathy would spread quickly in the modern age. As did Hervey Cleckley, Mask of Sanity, and Mary Astor, The Incredible Charlie Carewe, Mary Astor’s “The Incredible Charlie Carewe”, no doubt. I don’t know what went wrong.
Doesn’t know right from wrong, doesn’t understand what he did wrong, pansexual, developmentally arrested, consequences schmonsequences, psychopath.
In the eyes of the law, an individual is innocent until proven guilty of course. Here the public, and I’ve joined in, is judging him guilty. I believe there is enough believable and uncoordinated first person testimony on the public record. Unsupported statements from the police, prosecutors etc. should be considered hearsay until proven in court. We’ll see.
Currently Sanford Rubenstein faces serious charges. I urge no rush to judgment. The charges absolutely deserve to be investigated, but so does the background of the accuser for ties to law enforcement of the Cointelpro type. I’m not saying he’s not guilty, I’m not saying he’s guilty, we don’t have enough evidence in the public record to know. Moving to Occupy, they should have investigated (when they had money) the individuals accused of and accusing others of criminal acts. There is a long record of U.S. law enforcement engaging in character assassinations.
Recently I went to an email account of mine and found this ad.
For years (over 10) I would see this same ad (or a similar one for the same website) on an auction website that I went to frequently. I believe it now showed up in the email program to let me know it had been hacked (by a cop friend of my ex). What good is getting over on somebody, if you can’t let them know? Those who know how to do it can write scripts to send the metatags of their choice to advertising services.
This email website normally only has one series of ads. Yet I also saw, one time only, a Charmin bathroom tissue ad. I took this to mean that they had accessed my instrument/emergency supplies storage facility (no big deal).
Originally I thought the ad on the auction website was connected with firearms in the auctions. However I never searched for any firearms and most were long guns anyway. Furthermore this was the only firearm ad ever showing up. I believe they wanted me to click on it, presumably to portray me as a violent individual.
However I have zero interest in concealed carry personally. The only time I might wish to have a handgun would be if I lived on a farm or in bear country. Other than that, I wouldn’t be interested in owning one.
For awhile now, I’ve prevented ads from appearing on my computer. So I turned them back on and went to the same auction website. Voila:
How am I supposed to take this? Just more shenanigans from gas lighting psychopaths or something more sinister?
When the therapist husband of my ex’s therapist almost ran me down, he looked simply terrified. I have no idea why. I have no record of violence or violent threats. I believe one of the psychopathic cops is painting a false picture for his own purposes.
Now, there is a logical, nonviolent possible reason for their (my ex’s psychopathic police friends) believing these ads might be effective in drawing me in (I never clicked on one of them ever). But that would involve repeated jail time felonies on their part.
The NYPD knows who the main individual is through my communications. I wish they would prove to themselves the psychopathic-or-not status of this individual, through Adrian Raines brain scans (https://pathwhisperer.wordpress.com/tag/adrian-raine/).
From gaslighting – sociopath’s manipulation. at http://iluvjah.wordpress.com/, this hypothetical discussion might seem slight, but imagine the same conversation with many different details coming at you from many different angles, day in and day out. The aim (fully conscious in my opinion) is to pull the target into the morass, destabilize their footing, leave them in confusion.
John and Mary are a couple and live together, Mary does not smoke cigarettes, John does. Mary has nothing against John’s smoking in the flat, but one day she gets ill, has some breathing problems and the cigarette smoke starts to irritate her. On Monday, Mary, because of her illness, asks John not to smoke in the flat but to go outside. John agrees and when smoking, he goes outside. Friday evening, John, sitting next to Mary in the living room, lights up his cigarette, the argument starts.
M: John, I asked you not to smoke here, I do not feel good with that.
J: (already with a pitched voice) What? You didn’t say that you do not want me to smoke.
M: Yes, On Monday I asked you not to do that.
J: (almost shouting) No, I do not remember this discussion, but you told me yesterday – you were to buy the toiled paper and you did not do that. (gaslighting starts to work now).
M: Yes, I already did that – check the closet, but It was three days ago.
J: No, it was yesterday, and there is still no paper (still repeating that there is none, even if Mary assures him there is the paper)
M: No, It was on Tuesday, remember – it was when my friend came, she went to the toilet and could not find the paper – then you told me to go and buy.
J: (Mary shows the paper) That friend of yours is stupid, and I am sure it was yesterday… (cigarettes or paper?, no, there was nothing about smoking. Go on Johny – tell Mary how stupid is her friend…)
The story is made up, a little absurd and peculiar, but this is more or less how being in a relation with a sociopath looks like, and how pointless the arguments are.
Mary should feel guilty, John did nothing wrong… anyway he must stay in control. Depending on the situation – the aggressor ends up with a triumph on his face or just looks angry and pity. If he does not succeed he will be behaving like offended – he was the victim here and that was Mary who was his aggressor.
Thanks to many articles and experience, I learned how to recognize when the gaslighting is taking place and what to do when it happens – it is not easy… sometimes it is hard to feel that moment and you get into the argument – pointless argument in most cases. Those quarrels, in many cases start when the victim is trying to explain some difficult matter or defend against the aggressor and the aggressor feels the moment to put his sociopathic skills into work.
Once being a victim, after the realization moment, one should calm down and use the anti-sociopath formulas to get out of the argument:
- I will not quarrel with you, this is pointless.
- You make no sense, I will not continue this discussion.
- Please, stop, you make no sense, I will not talk about that any more now. http://iluvjah.wordpress.com/2014/09/04/sociopaths-time-manipulation/
Open message to FTI Consulting, I am offering my services, for $50,000, to create a dossier on Dov Charney’s psychopathic behaviors and consistencies, supporting the proposition that he is in fact a psychopath.
Psychopaths have no need of privacy, like little children playing with their privates in front of the guests. This trait, primitive, undeveloped sexuality with privacy unnecessary, is simply an aspect of the devastating arrested development of psychopaths, the primary psychopathic throughline.
Related posts: http://pathwhisperer.wordpress.com/2008/11/15/october-and-november-items-with-that-sociopathic-flavor/ (Anand Jon Alexander), http://pathwhisperer.wordpress.com/2009/09/03/not-frat-boy-behavior-sociopathic-behavior/, http://pathwhisperer.wordpress.com/?s=sexuality.